Self-Assessment, Peer Assessment, Teacher Assessment and their Comparative Effect on EFL Learners’ Second language Writing Strategy Development

سال انتشار: 1400
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 357

فایل این مقاله در 16 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_ELT-13-28_011

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 10 دی 1401

چکیده مقاله:

The effect of assessment types (self, peer, and teacher) on the EFL writing strategies development was examined in this study. Sixty upper-intermediate EFL learners at Qazvin Islamic university in four groups (one control and three experimental groups) were studied. One-way ANOVA checked homogeneity of the groups prior to the treatments and, then, the participants’ records and diaries were employed to gather data. Explanatory and descriptive analyses were implemented to analyze and classify the strategies the EFL learners picked up. This provided the type, frequency, and percentage of the strategies the participants mostly employed. The results revealed that the experimental groups, namely, self-assessment group, peer assessment group, and teacher assessment group employed more cognitive and meta-cognitive strategies than the control group. Affective strategies were more appealing to the control group. Focusing on the diction of the words, concentrating on the complex structures used by different writers, and making use of the structures the participants became interested in or found suitable were the most frequently referred to strategies. Teaching strategies the participants more picked up in this study might enhance EFL learners’ writing development at TEFL centers.

نویسندگان

- -

Department of English Language and Literature, Tehran University of Tehran, Iran.

مهران غفوری

Department of English Language Learning, Islamic Azad University, Abhar Branch, Abhar, Iran

پرویز بیرجندی

Department of English Language Teaching, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

سیروس ایزدپناه

Department of English Language Teaching, Zanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Ableeva, R. (۲۰۰۸). The effects of dynamic assessment on L۲ ...
  • Ableeva, R. (۲۰۱۰). Dynamic assessment of listening comprehension in second ...
  • Alavi, S. M., & Taghizadeh, M. (۲۰۱۴). Dynamic Assessment of ...
  • Arifin, S. (۲۰۲۰). Investigating the L۲ Writing Strategies Used by ...
  • Astin, A. W. (۲۰۱۲). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and ...
  • Atkinson, D. (۲۰۰۳). L۲ writing in the post-process era: Introduction. ...
  • Bachman, L. F. (۲۰۱۵). Justifying the use of language assessments: ...
  • Bachman, L. F., Palmer, A. S., & Palmer, A. S. ...
  • Brown, G. A., Bull, J., & Pendlebury, M. (۲۰۱۳). Assessing ...
  • Carson, J. G., & Longhini, A. (۲۰۰۲). Focusing on learning ...
  • Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (۲۰۱۷). Research design: ...
  • Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (۲۰۱۹). Mediating EFL learners’ academic ...
  • Ferretti, R. P., & Graham, S. (۲۰۱۹). Argumentative writing: theory, ...
  • Giraldo, F. (۲۰۲۱). A Reflection on Initiatives for Teachers’ Professional ...
  • Graham, S., & Perin, D. (۲۰۰۷). Writing next: Effective strategies ...
  • Gregg, L. W., & Steinberg, E. R. (Eds.). (۲۰۱۶). Cognitive ...
  • Guterman, E. (۲۰۰۲). Toward dynamic assessment of reading: Applying metacognitive ...
  • Hill, K., & Sabet, M. (۲۰۰۹). Dynamic speaking assessments. TESOL ...
  • Hsiao, T. Y., & Oxford, R. L. (۲۰۰۲). Comparing theories ...
  • Kovacic, A., Bubas, G., & Coric, A. (۲۰۱۲). Mobilising students’ ...
  • Kumaravadivelu, B. (۲۰۰۶). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. ...
  • McCrostie, J. (۲۰۰۷). Examining learner vocabulary notebooks. ELT Journal, ۶۱(۳), ...
  • O'malley, J. M., O'Malley, M. J., Chamot, A. U., & ...
  • Oxford, R. L. (۱۹۹۰). Language learning strategies-What every teacher should ...
  • Petersen, G. (۲۰۰۳). The effects of reading, television viewing, and ...
  • Pham, Q. H. P. (۲۰۲۰). Goal Setting in the Efl ...
  • Poehner, M. E. (۲۰۰۸). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to ...
  • Rastle, K., Lally, C., Davis, M. H., & Taylor, J. ...
  • Riazi, A. (۱۹۹۷). Acquiring disciplinary literacy: A social-cognitive analysis of ...
  • Rose, H., Briggs, J. G., Boggs, J. A., Sergio, L., ...
  • Saeidi, M., & Hosseinpour, A. (۲۰۱۳). The effect of dynamic ...
  • Sasaki, M., Mizumoto, A., & Murakami, A. (۲۰۱۸). Developmental trajectories ...
  • SeyedErfani, S., & Agha Ebrahimiyan, A. (۲۰۱۳). Web ۲.۰ incorporated ...
  • Smith, H. (۲۰۰۵). The writing experiment strategies for innovative creative ...
  • Stirling, B. (۲۰۲۱). Speaking and writing strategies for the TOEFL ...
  • Sundari, H., Febriyanti, R. H., & Saragih, G. (۲۰۱۸). Using ...
  • Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (۲۰۱۸). Formative self-and peer assessment ...
  • William, D. (۲۰۱۳). Assessment: The Bridge between Teaching and Learning. ...
  • Zabihi, R. (۲۰۱۸). The role of cognitive and affective factors ...
  • Zhao, C. G., & Liao, L. (۲۰۲۱). Metacognitive strategy use ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع