Depth of Vocabulary, Morphology, and Inference Making as Predictors of EFLs Pragmatic Knowledge

سال انتشار: 1401
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 149

فایل این مقاله در 30 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_TELJ-16-2_006

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 29 آبان 1401

چکیده مقاله:

Pragmatics is described as the use of language appropriately in diverse and real circumstances to achieve various communicational goals. Despite the significant importance of pragmatic knowledge, second/foreign language learners have been reported to lack acceptable levels of pragmatic competence. To optimize pedagogical techniques implemented in second/foreign language classrooms and increase levels of pragmatic knowledge among second/foreign language learners, component skills that explain variations of pragmatic knowledge need to be delineated. To address the area, ۳۳ Iranian upper-intermediate foreign language learners, having been screened through Venture placement test, were tested in terms of size and depth of vocabulary knowledge, morpho-syntax knowledge, inference making as independent variables, and pragmatic knowledge as dependent variable. Results from linear regression analysis indicated that depth of vocabulary, morphological knowledge, and inference making ability contribute to pragmatic knowledge, with the depth of vocabulary knowledge being the most powerful predictor. However, the model explained less than ۴۰ percent of pragmatic knowledge. It indicated that pragmatic knowledge is complex. Although mastery over this set of cognitive-linguistic skills can be used as a tool to disentangle semantic clues in different contexts, teaching such cognitive-linguistic and metalinguistic skills can only partially meet the learners’ need to master pragmatic knowledge. Pertinent suggestions and implications for the second/foreign language classrooms are discussed according to the obtained results.  

نویسندگان

Mitra P. Niyazi

Department of English Language, Chabahar Maritime University, Chabahar, Iran

Hooshang Khoshsima

Department of English Language, Chabahar Maritime University, Chabahar, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Aryadoust, V., & Baghaei, P. (۲۰۱۶). Does EFL readers' lexical ...
  • Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Mahan-Taylor, R. (۲۰۰۳). Introduction to teaching pragmatics. ...
  • Bauler, C. (۲۰۲۲). Speech Acts and Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. In Information Resource ...
  • Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. V. (۲۰۱۸). Vocabulary development and ...
  • Larson-Hall, J. (۲۰۱۰). A Guide to doing Statistics in Second ...
  • Matthews, D., Biney, H., & Abbot-Smith, K. (۲۰۱۸). Individual differences ...
  • Mey, J. L. (۲۰۰۱). Pragmatics. Blackwell ...
  • Nassaji, H. (۲۰۰۷). Schema theory and knowledge‐based processes in second ...
  • Perfetti, C. A. (۱۹۸۵). Reading ability. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ...
  • Read, J. (۲۰۰۰). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/۱۰.۱۰۱۷/cbo۹۷۸۰۵۱۱۷۳۲۹۴۲ Sarani, A., ...
  • Savic, V. (۲۰۱۸). Reading in English: Inference skills of young ...
  • Spencer-Oatey, H. and Jiang, W.Y. (۲۰۰۳). Explaining cross-cultural pragmatic findings: ...
  • Taguchi, N. (۲۰۰۸). Pragmatic comprehension in Japanese as a foreign ...
  • Tsuchiya, K. (۲۰۲۱). Discourses of pragmatics studies: interlanguage and English ...
  • Wisniewska, I. (۲۰۱۳). Vocabulary and Grammar for the TOEFL Test. ...
  • Xiao, F., Taguchi, N., & Li, S. (۲۰۱۹). Effects of ...
  • Zhang, Y., & Papi, M. (۲۰۲۱). Motivation and Second Language ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع