Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) Vs. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP) after Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome
محل انتشار: مجله بین المللی کودکان، دوره: 10، شماره: 5
سال انتشار: 1401
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 194
فایل این مقاله در 10 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_INJPM-10-5_005
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 2 خرداد 1401
چکیده مقاله:
Background: There is insufficient evidence supporting the superiority of the Nasal Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) over the Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP) in initial respiratory support of preterm neonates suffering from the Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS). The present study intended to compare the effectiveness of these two approaches in preterm neonates with RDS who receive the Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA).Methods: The present clinical trial included ۹۵ preterm neonates at the Fatemieh Hospital, Hamadan, Iran, from October ۲۰۱۹ to September ۲۰۲۰, with RDS, admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Sampling was performed using the convenience method. The participants were randomly assigned into two groups that received the NIPPV (n=۴۸) or NCPAP (n=۴۷) as the respiratory support method. Moreover, the neonates received LISA if needed. The groups were compared in the outcomes, such as the need for intubation within ۷۲ hours after birth.Results: The groups were similar in clinical characteristics at birth. According to our findings, the NIPPV group had a significantly lower rate of need for intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation within ۷۲ hours after birth compared to the control group (۸.۳% vs. ۲۷.۷%, P=۰.۰۱۴); however, the groups were not significantly different regarding the need for the second dose of surfactant (۶۶% vs. ۵۶.۲%, P=۰.۳۳۲), the mean respiratory support duration (۶.۸۹±۳.۲۰ vs. ۶.۷۰±۳.۷۱ days, P=۰.۲۹۵), the mean hospital stay (۱۹.۵۲±۱۲.۳۶۴ vs. ۱۷.۴۰±۹.۵۷ days, P=۰.۵۹۱), development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (۴.۲% vs. ۸.۵%, P=۰.۴۳۵), and mortality (۶.۲۵% vs. ۱۲.۸%, P=۰.۳۱۷).Conclusion: Compared to NCPAP, the NIPPV could significantly reduce the need for invasive mechanical ventilation within ۷۲ hours after birth in neonates undergoing LISA
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
Mohammad Kazem Sabzehei
Hamadan University of Medical Sciences
Behnaz Basiri
Department of Pediatrics, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
Maryam Shokouhi
hamedan university of medical science
Mojdeh Afkhami Goli
Department of Pediatrics, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Fatemeh Eghbalian
Pediatric department, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences , Hamadan , Iran
Abbas Moradi
Department of community medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Science , Hamadan, Iran.
مراجع و منابع این مقاله:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :