The Symbolic, Mysterious Language in the Thought of Muslim Philosophers

سال انتشار: 1400
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 108

فایل این مقاله در 22 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_RIURD-10-19_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 23 دی 1400

چکیده مقاله:

Man employs a variety of methods to communicate his ideas and intentions. When he trusts that his audiences are competent enough to comprehend his oral or written message, and when he feels assured that no prejudice or misunderstanding exists on the part of the audience; he speaks directly and avoids figurative or ambiguous language. In contrast, if he feels or predicts otherwise, he tends to apply another strategy, expressing meanings implicitly under the guise of allusion, symbolism, and/or allegories. Some researchers believe that symbolic mysterious language (ramz) is exclusively employed in mathematics and mysticism to express topical objectives, but in this article, we will attempt to explain the application of this language in philosophy, and demonstrate why Muslim philosophers leaned toward using this encoded language. The author of the present study believes, to the best of his knowledge, that this research study is the first of its kind that seeks to explore the motives and considerations behind the use of this encoded language by philosophers.Man employs a variety of methods to communicate his ideas and intentions. When he trusts that his audiences are competent enough to comprehend his oral or written message, and when he feels assured that no prejudice or misunderstanding exists on the part of the audience; he speaks directly and avoids figurative or ambiguous language. In contrast, if he feels or predicts otherwise, he tends to apply another strategy, expressing meanings implicitly under the guise of allusion, symbolism, and/or allegories. Some researchers believe that symbolic mysterious language (ramz) is exclusively employed in mathematics and mysticism to express topical objectives, but in this article, we will attempt to explain the application of this language in philosophy, and demonstrate why Muslim philosophers leaned toward using this encoded language. The author of the present study believes, to the best of his knowledge, that this research study is the first of its kind that seeks to explore the motives and considerations behind the use of this encoded language by philosophers.

نویسندگان

Zakaria Baharnezhad

Ph. D., Associate Professor, Department of Wisdom and Theology, Faculty of Theology and Religious Studies, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Avicenna, Husayn ibn ʿAbd Allah. ۱۹۸۲. Al-Isharat wa al-tanbihat (Remarks ...
  • Avicenna, Husayn ibn ʿAbd Allah. ۲۰۰۹. A Collection of Avicenna’s ...
  • Copleston. ۱۹۹۶. A History of Philosophy. Translated by Seyed Jalaleddin ...
  • Corbin, Henry. ۲۰۰۵. Creative Imagination in the Sūfism of Ibn ...
  • Fanari, ʿAli ibn Hamza. ۱۹۹۵. Misbah al-uns. Tehran: Mowla ...
  • Farabi, Abu Nasr. ۱۹۸۴. The Gathering of the Ideas of ...
  • Furghani, Saʿid al-Din. ۲۰۰۰. Mashariq al-darari. Qom: Boostan-e Ketab. Ibn ʿArabi, ...
  • Ilkhani, Muhammad. ۲۰۰۶. History of Philosophy in the Middle Ages. ...
  • Khaqani-Shirvani, Afdal al-Din. ۲۰۱۰. Divan of Poems. Tehran: Iqbal ...
  • Lacoste, John. ۱۹۹۷. A History of Philosophy in the Twentieth ...
  • Lahiji, Shams al-Din Muhammad. ۲۰۰۴. Mafatih al-iʿaz fi sharh Gulshan-i ...
  • Majlisi, Muhammad Baqir. ۱۹۶۵. Bihār al-anwār [The Seas of Light]. ...
  • Mir Damad, Muhammad Baqir. ۲۰۰۱. Jazawat wa mawaqit. Tehran: Miras-e ...
  • Noss, John. ۱۹۶۶. A History of the World’s Religions. Translated ...
  • Rumi, Jalal al-Din Muhammad. ۱۹۸۱. Mathnawi. Translated by Reynold Alleyne Nicholson. ...
  • Shahrzuri, Shams al-Din Muhammad. ۲۰۰۱. Sharh Hikmat al-ishraq. Tehran: Institute ...
  • Suhrawardi, Shihab al-Din. ۱۹۷۶. Three Treatises. Edited by Najafgholi Habibi. ...
  • Shirazi, Qutb al-Din. ۲۰۰۱. Sharh Hikmat al-ishraq. The Institute of ...
  • Shirazi, Sadr al-Din Muhammad. ۱۹۶۳. Mafatih al-ghayb [Keys to the ...
  • Shirazi, Sadr al-Din Muhammad. ۱۹۸۱. Al-Asfar al-arbaʿa. Beirut: Dar Ihyaʾ ...
  • Shirazi, Sadr al-Din Muhammad. ۱۹۸۷. Sharh Usul al-Kafi. Tehran: The ...
  • Shirazi, Sadr al-Din Muhammad. ۲۰۰۳. Mafatih al-ghayb (Keys to the ...
  • Taftazani Masʿud b. ʿUmar al-. ۱۹۸۸. Kitab al-Mutawwal fi sharh ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع