A New Chromosome Number Report in Stachys L. Species by Use of Karyological Analysis

سال انتشار: 1400
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 264

فایل این مقاله در 7 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_SGR-7-1_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 6 اردیبهشت 1400

چکیده مقاله:

The somatic chromosome numbers and karyotype features of seven populations representing three species of Stachys L. (Lamiaceae), which are naturally distributed across Iran, were described. The results confirm the presence of different basic chromosome numbers including x = ۱۵ and ۱۷ within the genus. All the studied taxa were diploid and the chromosome counts of two species including S. benthamiana and S. setifera (۲n = ۳۴) are reported for the first time, while the chromosome number of S. byzantina (۲n = ۳۰) is confirmed. The chromosomes in the studied taxa of Stachys were generally small, as the longest chromosome length was detected on S. setifera (۱۸۷۱۳) (۲.۲۶ μm), whereas S. setifera (۲۳۳۵۴) demonstrated the shortest length (۱.۴۶ μm). The karyotypes were symmetrical composing of metacentric chromosomes as indicated by their mean arm ratio (AR) that ranged between ۱.۱۱ in S. setifera (۲۳۳۵۴) and ۱.۲۹ in S. byzantina (۳۷۹۸۵), so it was classified as class ۱A according to Stebbins’ categories. Based on the values of total form percentage (TF%, ۴۷.۱%), Arano index of karyotype asymmetry (AsK%, ۵۲.۵%), symmetry index (S%, ۹۴.۰%) and differences of range relative length (DRL, ۰.۳۶), S. setifera (۲۳۳۵۴) had the most inter-and intra-chromosomal symmetric karyotype. Also, S. byzantina (۳۷۹۸۵) had the most inter-and intra-chromosomal asymmetric karyotype based on the values of TF% (۴۲.۰%), AsK% (۵۶.۱%), and relative length of chromosome (RL%, ۶.۶%). The results of cluster analysis based on chromosomal parameters divided the taxa into two main groups using the Ward method. Group I included taxa with x = ۱۷ and group II contained S. byzantina (x = ۱۵).

نویسندگان

Akram Rajabi Mazaher

Department of Horticulture, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

Seied Mehdi Miri

Department of Horticulture, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

Abdollah Mohammadi

Department of Plant Breeding, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Akçiçek E, Dirmenci T, Dündar E. 2012. Taxonomical notes on ...
  • Akçiçek E. 2020. Taxonomic revision of Stachys sect. Olisia (Lamiaceae: ...
  • Arano H. 1963. Cytological studies in subfamily Carduoideae (Compositae) of ...
  • Baltisberger M, Widmer A. 2009. Karyological data of some angiosperms ...
  • Baltisberger M. 2002. Cytological investigations on some Albanian plant species. ...
  • Baltisberger M. 2006. Cytological investigations on Bulgarian phanerogams. Willdenowia 36 ...
  • Bilušić Vundać V. 2019. Taxonomical and phytochemical characterisation of 10 ...
  • Dirmenci T, Yıldız B, Akçiçek E, Martin E, Dündar E. ...
  • Fallahi M, Mohammadi A, Miri SM. 2020. The natural variation ...
  • Floden AA. 2016. A new endemic hedgenettle (Stachys: Lamiaceae) from ...
  • Gedik O, Kocabaş YZ. 2020. Karyological characteristics of five endemic ...
  • Gill LS. 1980. Cytotaxonomy of the genus Stachys L. in ...
  • Goren AC. 2014. Use of Stachys species (mountain tea) as ...
  • Güner Ö, Selvi S, Altınordu F, Martin E. 2019. The ...
  • Huziwara Y. 1962. Karyotype analysis in some genera of Compositeae. ...
  • Keshavarzi M, Rezaei MB, Miri SM. 2016. The comparison of ...
  • Khadivi-Khub A, Aghaei Y. 2015. Chromosome counts and karyotypic study ...
  • Levan A, Fredga K, Sandberg AA. 1964. Nomenclature for centromeric ...
  • Marhold K. 2011. IAPT/IOPB chromosome data 11. Taxon 60: 1220-1223. ...
  • Martin E, Altınordu F, Güner Ö, Akçiçek E. 2016. Karyological ...
  • Martin E, Çetin Ö, Akçiçek E, Dirmenci T. 2011. New ...
  • Medeiros-Neto E, Nollet F, Moraes AP, Felix LP. 2017. Intrachromosomal ...
  • Oroji Salmasi K, Javadi H, Miri SM. 2019. Karyotype analysis ...
  • Peruzzi L, Eroğlu HE. 2013. Karyotype asymmetry: again, how to ...
  • Rad AC, Atri M, Mohsenzadeh F, Jahandideh E. 2012. Chromosome ...
  • Salmaki Y, Zarre S, Govaerts R, Bräuchler C. 2012. A ...
  • Samaropoulou S, Bareka P, Artelari R, Kamari G. 2013. Karyological ...
  • Seijo JG, Fernández A. 2003. Karyotype analysis and chromosome evolution ...
  • Stebbins GL. 1971. Chromosomal Evolution in Higher Plants. Edward Arnold ...
  • Strid A. 1965. Studies in the Aegean flora: VI. Notes ...
  • Tarinejad AR, Mirshekari B. 2009. Study on variation of karyotypes ...
  • Techio VH, Resende LV, Braz GT, Resende KF, Samartini CQ. ...
  • Tundis R, Peruzzi L, Menichini F. 2014. Phytochemical and biological ...
  • Zakaria RA, Zare N. 2013. Karyotypic analysis on Stachys lavandulifolia ...
  • Zuo L, Yuan Q. 2011. The difference between the heterogeneity ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع