Comparison and analysis of tariff reduction of infrastructural sectors and its economic impact: ACGE approach

سال انتشار: 1400
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 262

فایل این مقاله در 10 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IJHCUM-6-3_004

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 1 اردیبهشت 1400

چکیده مقاله:

Background and Objectives: The reduction of tariffs in Public infrastructure sectors is believed to be one of the key factors in addressing the socio-economic challenges of high unemployment, income inequality, and poverty. The primary objective of this paper is to design a general equilibrium model for infrastructural sectors among Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom, China, USA, Australia, Japan and Korea, and evaluate potential economic impact of tariff reduction. Methods: The research method of this paper was to construct a Computational General Equilibrium model to assess the economic effects. The global trade analysis project model was calibrated and discussed in this paper. The global trade analysis project database was used to validate the model. Findings: Simulation result showed that tariff removal in infrastructure has the most significant effects in China, Japan, and Korea’s economic growth and employment than other countries. Gross Domestic Product, output price, and social welfare increase significantly in China compared to other countries. Gross Domestic Product increases in China by 616%, decreases in Japan and Korea 77% and 7% after mutual tariff reduction on infrastructure sectors. Meanwhile, China’s export on infrastructural sector increases by 1.71%, Japan and Korea’s export increases by 0.75% and 0.05%. On the other hand, export decreases in Germany, France, Italy, UK, USA and Australia. Finally, social welfare increases in China by $2.26 billion and Japan by $239 million. Conclusion: The presence of tariff reduction in infrastructure sectors will likely strengthen the market share of most of the simulated regions. These findings may provide policy-makers with crucial information for better understanding about new tariff policy. Computable General Equilibrium analysis in infrastructure sectors had paid little attention in past and this paper tries to fill the gaps and attempts to find the benefit of mutual tariff policy among countries based on global trade analysis project model.

کلیدواژه ها:

economic growth ، Global trade analysis project ، Infrastructure ، Regions

نویسندگان

S.Sh. Hossain

The Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development, The Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China

H. Delin

The Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development, The Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Aguira, A.; Narayanan, B.; Mcdougall, R., (2016). An outline of ...
  • Arman, S.A.; Manesh, A.S.; Izady, A.T., (2015). Design of a ...
  • Annala, C.N.; Batina, R.G., Feehan, J.P., (2008). Empirical impact of ...
  • Boccanfuso, D.; Joanis, M.; Richard, P.; Savard, L., (2014). A ...
  • Bougheas, S.; Demetriades, P.O.; Morgenroth, E.L.W., (1999). Infrastructure, transport costs ...
  • Bronzini, R.; Piselli, P., (2009). Determinants of long-run regional productivity ...
  • Canning, D.; Pedroni, P., (2004), The Effect of infrastructure on ...
  • Crescenzi, R.; Rodríguez-Pose, A., (2012). Infrastructure and regional growth in ...
  • Démurger, S., (2001). Infrastructure development and economic growth: an explanation ...
  • Esfahani, H.S.; Ramı́rez, M.T., (2003). Institutions, infrastructure, and economic growth. ...
  • Ferreira, P.C.; Vargas, F.G.; Do Nascimento, L.G., (2006). Welfare and ...
  • Fan, S.; Chan-Kang, C., (2004). Returns to investment in less-favored ...
  • Garcia-Mila, T.; McGuire, T.J.; Porter, R.H., (1996). The effect of ...
  • Garcia-Milà, T.; McGuire, T.J., (1992). The contribution of publicly provided ...
  • Graham, S., (2000). Constructing premium network spaces: reflections on infrastructure ...
  • Hertel, W.T., (1999).Future Directions in global trade analysis. Working papers ...
  • Haynes, K.E.; Xie, Q.; Ding, L., (2004). Political geography, public ...
  • Jalan, J.; Ravallion, M., (2002). Geographic poverty traps? A micro ...
  • Li, Y., (2015). Public infrastructure investment in China: a recursive ...
  • Limão, N.; Venables, A.J., (2001). Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage, transport Costs, ...
  • McDaniel, C.A.; Balistreri, E.J., (2002). A discussion on Armington trade ...
  • Partridge, M.D.; Rickman, D.S., (1998). Regional computable general equilibrium modeling: ...
  • Rioja, F.K., (2001). Growth, welfare, and public infrastructure: a general ...
  • Rutherford, T.F., (1998). GTAP in gams: the dataset and static ...
  • Stewart, F.; Yermo, J., (2012).Infrastructure investment in new markets: challenges ...
  • Sloboda, B.W.; Yao, V.W., (2008). Interstate spillovers of private capital ...
  • Sahoo, P.; Dash, R.K.; Nataraj, G., (2010). Infrastructure development and ...
  • Seung, C.K.; Kraybill, D.S., (2001). The effects of infrastructure investment: ...
  • Savard, L., (2010). Scaling up infrastructure spending in the Philippines: ...
  • Zou, P.X.W.; Wang, S.; Fang, D., (2008). A life‐cycle risk ...
  • Walmsley, T.L., (2006). A baseline scenario for the dynamic GTAP ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع