Proactive Teaching: Development and Validation of a Scale to Evaluate Constructivist Teaching in Higher Education

سال انتشار: 1399
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 219

فایل این مقاله در 12 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_MEDIA-11-1_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 18 فروردین 1400

چکیده مقاله:

Background: Constructivist teaching is deemed beneficial across most educational contexts, and is particularly valued and utilized in tertiary settings. Yet to date, no tools have been made available for measuring and evaluating the construct.This study aimed at developing and validating a scale to evaluate the proactive teaching (based on Constructivism) in higher education. Methods: The present research is an exploratory mixed methodology. The statistical population of the present study included all students of psychology, education, social sciences, medicine and management of University of Tehran during the 2015-16 academic years. The first phase of the research involved developing a tool within a framework of qualitative methodology and phenomenology based on semi-structured interviews collected from 100 students selected through purposeful sampling. The second phase incorporated the data collected from 500 students selected by stratified random sampling to validate the six-dimension scale through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Results: The result was the conceptualization of six dimensions of active learning: self-organization, constructivism, cognitive involvement, participation and cooperation, teacher as facilitator, and constructivist evaluation. The results showed that the Proactive Teaching Scale (which includes 6 components and 42 items) has adequate properties to evaluate this teaching method in higher education explaining 53.48% of the total variance. Ordinal Theta coefficient (0.86 - 0.92) indicated good internal validity. Conclusion: The Proactive Teaching Scale provides a valuable tool to evaluate constructivist teaching, and contributes to improved teaching and learning practices in higher education.

نویسندگان

Mansoureh Hajhosseini

Department of Educational Psychology and Consulting, University of Tehran, Iran

Sediqhe Hosseini Shabanan

Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Elham Sadat Naji

Department of Educational Psychology, University of Tehran, Iran

Zahra Naghsh

Department of Educational Psychology and Consulting, University of Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Piaget J. Piaget’s theory. Handbook of child psychology. 1983; 1(4). ...
  • Shunk DH. Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective, © 2012. ...
  • Doyle JK. The cognitive psychology of systems thinking. System Dynamics ...
  • Huitt W. Constructivism. Educational psychology interactive. Retrieved April. 2003; 2:2008. ...
  • Vygotsky LS. Tool and sign in the development of the ...
  • Bruner J. The process of education. 1960, Cambridge: Harvard UP. ...
  • Bruner JS. Acts of meaning. Harvard university press; 1990. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291700030555 ...
  • Wood, D. J., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). ...
  • Bromley P. Active learning strategies for diverse learning styles: Simulations ...
  • Snowman J, McCown R. Psychology applied to teaching. Nelson Education; ...
  • Aviram A. Beyond constructivism: Autonomy-oriented education. In Conflicting Philosophies of ...
  • Van de Walle JA. Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching ...
  • Struyven K, Dochy F, Janssens S, Gielen S. On the ...
  • El Asmar JP, Mady C. A constructivist approach to design ...
  • Brynen R. (Ending) civil war in the classroom: A peacebuilding ...
  • Waring M, Evans C. Understanding pedagogy: Developing a critical approach ...
  • Meyers C, Jones TB. Promoting Active Learning. Strategies for the ...
  • Bromley P. Active learning strategies for diverse learning styles: Simulations ...
  • Killian M, Bastas H. The effects of an active learning ...
  • Parmar D, Trotter E. Keeping our students: identifying factors that ...
  • Pedersen DE. Active and collaborative learning in an undergraduate sociological ...
  • Stewart AC, Houghton SM, Rogers PR. Instructional design, active learning, ...
  • Rolloff M. A constructivist model for teaching evidence-based practice. Nursing ...
  • Shroff RH, Ting FS, Lam WH. Development and validation of ...
  • Huang HM, Liaw SS. An analysis of learners’ intentions toward ...
  • Ronnie, H. Sh and Fridolin, S. Th, T (2019) https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.2503 ...
  • Machumu H, Zhu C. The relationship between student conceptions of ...
  • Lim DH, Tschopp-Harris K. Inverted Constructivism to Leverage Mobile-Technology-Based Active ...
  • Gall MD, Borg WR, Gall JP. Educational research: An introduction. ...
  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & ...
  • Velazquez L, Munguia N, Sanchez M. Deterring sustainability in higher ...
  • Herrington J, Oliver R. An instructional design framework for authentic ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع