Comparison of Stone-Free Rates after Ureteroscopic Pneumatic Lithotripsy in Impacted vs. Non-Impacted upper Ureteral Stones

سال انتشار: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 295

فایل این مقاله در 5 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_TUMS-1-2_007

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 17 فروردین 1400

چکیده مقاله:

IntroductionStone impaction in ureteral is defined as an unchanged stone location for at least 2 months or an inability to pass guidewire up to the stone intraoperatively. This study aims to evaluate the effect of stone impaction on pneumatic transurethral lithotripsy in upper ureteral stones. And to assess if stone impaction could be a factor that prevents retropulsion of upper ureteral stones. MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, patients referred with upper ureteral stone to the urology clinic of Sina hospital between May 2014 to May 2018 were evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups: those with stone impaction (Group A) and those without impaction of stone (Group B). Transurethral lithotripsy (TUL) procedure with pneumatic lithotripter was performed in all patients. The data were extracted from patients’ documents and files retrospectively and analyzed. Quantitate data were shown by the number (%) and they were compared by chi-square test. The p-value Results70 patients with upper ureteral stones were evaluated. 38 patients (54.2%) in group A and 32 (45.7%) in group B. Average stone size was 7 mm (5-12) and there wasn’t a significant difference in stone burden between the two groups. Stone-free rate (SFR) was significantly less in group B. (90% in group A versus 19% in group B, p-value <0.001). Almost 1.7% of patients experienced complications, there wasn’t a significant difference between the two groups. ConclusionsBased on the better success rate of pneumatic TUL in upper ureteral impacted stones in comparison with non-impacted stones, we could conclude that having an impacted stone could be a favorable risk factor for successful TUL. The reason could be less migration of these types of stones.

کلیدواژه ها:

نویسندگان

Alimohammad Fakhr Yasseri

Urology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Morteza Hamidi

Departemnt of Urology, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Seyed Mohammad Kazem Aghamir

Urology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • References: ...
  • 1.            Nikoobakht MR, Emamzadeh A, Abedi AR, Moradi K, Mehrsai ...
  • 2.            Kassem A, ElFayoumy H, ElSaied W, ElGammal M, Bedair ...
  • 3.            Bapat SS, Pai KV, Purnapatre SS, Yadav PB, Padye ...
  • 4.            Deliveliotis C, Chrisofos M, Albanis S, Serafetinides E, Varkarakis ...
  • 5.            Özbir S, Can O, Atalay HA, Canat HL, Çakır ...
  • 6.            Zheng J, Wang Y, Chen B, Wang H, Liu ...
  • 7.            Seitz C, Tanovic E, Kikic Z, Fajkovic H. Impact ...
  • 8.            Legemate JD, Wijnstok NJ, Matsuda T, Strijbos W, Erdogru ...
  • 9.            C. Türk  AN, A. Petrik, C. Seitz, A. Skolarikos ...
  • 10.          Binbay M, Tepeler A, Singh A, Akman T, Tekinaslan ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع