RESILIENCE AGAINST EARTHQUAKES: SOME PRACTICAL SUGGESTIONS FOR PLANNERS AND MANAGERS

سال انتشار: 1390
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 878

فایل این مقاله در 8 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

SEE06_471

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 16 اردیبهشت 1390

چکیده مقاله:

Resilience against earthquakes is a broad concept that requires a multi-disciplinary response.This paper offers a working definition of resilience and associated concepts, including vulnerability to earthquakes, coping, capacity and redundancy. It concludes that resilience must be set in motion and maintained by a collective effort that involves all stakeholders and people who are at risk in areas of high seismicity. Resilience is one of the fundamental components of disaster risk reduction (DRR), an overall strategy for adapting to and mitigating the impact of extreme events on people and society. The paper offers a modest contribution to the creation of a methodology for resilience against earthquakes. This includes ten suggestions for action, as follows. (1) Tell people what to do in an earthquake. Research is needed on the best forms of self protective behaviour during seismic emergencies. This needs one to understand the characteristic forms of building failure and how they affect building occupants. It also requires knowledge of how people react to earthquakes and what opportunities there are for self-protective behaviour. (2) Develop urban search and rescue capacity on site. This need not be expensive or particularly challenging. It requires stockpiling of basic rescue equipment at strategic points in urban areas and training programmes for local residents. (3) Reduce non-structural as well as structural hazards. A significant proportion of earthquake injuries arises from damage to the non-structural elements of the built environment. Anchoring and securing these, and designing them to resist earthquake displacement, can save lives and reduce the incidence of serious injuries. (4) Plan flexibly. Emergency planning should be a process and not an end. It must be adapted continually to changes in knowledge of hazards and in society and its vulnerability. (5) Create networks. These can improve the exchange of knowledge, information and training. Networks are needed at all scales, from the local to the international, and from professionals to local residents threatened by earthquakes. (6) Encourage governance. This requires involvement of many different kinds of stakeholder in the processes of earthquake disaster risk reduction. (7) Make good practice proliferate and adapt it to local circumstances. (8) Ensure that programmes of DRR are sustainable in the long term. In order to work they must have a constant revenue stream and also the full support of beneficiaries. (9) Before the next major seismic event occurs create a strategy for recovering from it. Consider how the recovery will be planned and guided, and what needs will be generated by the event. (10) Create a culture of resilience against earthquakes, in which the problem is widely understood and taken seriously by people who are at risk or are in positions of authority. This also involves sharing knowledge about earthquakes and sharing the risk to society.

نویسندگان

David Alexander

PhD Chief Senior Scientist, Global Risk Forum Promenade ۳۵, CH-۷۲۷۰ Davos Platz (GR), Switzerland

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Alexander, D.E. 2011. Mortality and morbidity risk in the L'Aquila, ...
  • Berkes, F. 2007. Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: lessons from ...
  • Billing, P. and U. Madengruber 2006. Overcoming the black hole ...
  • _ Birkmann, J. 2006. Indicators and criteria for measuring vulnerability: ...
  • Brower, R.S., S.O. Choi, H-S. Jeong and J. Dilling 2009. ...
  • Cannon, T. 2006. Vulnerability analysis, livelihoods and disasters. In W.J. ...
  • Carroll, J.S. 20)4. Redundancy _ a design principle and an ...
  • De Bruycker, M., D. Greco, I. Annino, M.A. Stazi, N. ...
  • Durkin, M.E. 1989. The role of the physical setting in ...
  • El-Tawil, S. and B. Aguirre 2010. Search and rescue in ...
  • Forrest, T.R. 1973. Needs and group emergence: developing a welfare ...
  • Foster, H.D. 1980. Disaster Planning: The Preservation of Life and ...
  • Hoffman, R.M. 1948. A generalised concept of resilience. Textile Research ...
  • Holling, C.S. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual ...
  • Lomnitz, C. 1970. Casualties and behaviour of populations during earthquakes. ...
  • Murphy, B.L. 2007. Locating social capital in resilient community- level ...
  • Olson, R.S. and R.A. Olson 1987. Urban heavy rescue. Earthquake ...
  • Petal, M.A. 2004. Urban Disaster Mitigation and Preparedness: The 1999 ...
  • Qian Ye 2010. Integrated risk governance project: towards better governance ...
  • . Rutter, M. 1987. Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. American ...
  • Sami, F., F. Ali, S.H.H. Zaidi, H. Rehman, T. Ahmad ...
  • Spence, R. 2007. Saving lives in earthquakes: Successes and failures ...
  • Xie, L-L., Y-H. Ma and J-J. Hu 2007. A conception ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع