اولویت بندی عوامل موثر بر انجام پزشکی مبتنی بر شواهد در پزشکان طرف قرارداد بیمه سلامت ایران
محل انتشار: فصلنامه تخصصی تحقیقات سلامت، دوره: 8، شماره: 2
سال انتشار: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 313
فایل این مقاله در 7 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
این مقاله در بخشهای موضوعی زیر دسته بندی شده است:
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_JCHR-8-2_003
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 20 دی 1399
چکیده مقاله:
Introduction: The utilization of the medical research results is one of the most important indicators in the development of this profession, which provides effective care to patients and improves the quality of care. However, performing based on the evidence-based results has been unsuccessful in some cases. This study aimed to investigated and prioritize the factors affecting evidence-based medicine among physicians affiliated to Iranian Health insurance.
Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 150 physicians affiliated to Iranian Health insurance in Tehran city in 2018. The simple random sampling method was used to collect the data. The data collection tool was a questionnaire containing of three parts: demographic questionnaire, Fonk (1995) evidence-based medical barriers questionnaire that included four domains and 25 questions, as well as a researcher-made questionnaire that prioritized the factors influencing evidence-based medicine implementation. Data were analyzed by SPSS version 21 and Expert Choice software using hierarchical analysis method.
Results: Most physicians were male (53.3%) and worked as an official employee. Among four dimensions, the highest mean and standard deviation was related to organizational impact, while the lowest was related to the quality of research and possible outcomes. Regarding the factors of organizational impacts, the highest weight or priority was attributed to the feeling of insufficient independence to change care methods with a weight of 0.259. Among the factors related to the research quality, the highest weight and priority was related to the factor of methodological defects in the research with a weight of 0.192. Considering the factors related to the skills of conducting research, the highest priority and weight was attributed to the lack of documentary evidence for the performance change with a weight of 0.320. Moreover, regarding the factors related to communication and access to the findings of the research, the highest weight and priority was in the factor of unavailability of actual articles (0.475).
Conclusion: The findings of this study showed that physicians considered problems and barriers related to organization, individual, and quality of research studies. Therefore, facilities should be created for using research findings as well as the conditions for updating physicianschr('39') knowledge, skills, and attitudes to use the research results.
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
Farnaz Mohamadhoseinzadeh Hashemi
گروه مدیریت خدمات بهداشتی، دانشکده مدیریت و علوم اجتماعی، واحد شمال تهران، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
Mehrnoosh Jafari
گروه مدیریت بهداشت، دانشکده مدیریت و علوم انسانی، واحد شمال تهران، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
Seyed Mojtaba Hosseini
گروه مدیریت خدمات بهداشتی، دانشکده مدیریت و علوم اجتماعی، واحد شمال تهران، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران