تحلیل و بررسی دیدگاه ابن ابی الحدید درباره جعل حدیث در زمان امویان شاخه سفیانی
محل انتشار: دوفصلنامه پژوهشنامه علوی، دوره: 11، شماره: 21
سال انتشار: 1399
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: فارسی
مشاهده: 374
فایل این مقاله در 24 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_ALAVI-11-21_004
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 17 آذر 1399
چکیده مقاله:
Ibn Abi al-Hidad accused Mu'awiya of blasphemy and atheism, indicating with evidence that he had no belief in the prophet of the Prophet (pbuh) and believed that he was forging a group of hypocrites and religion to sellers, Hadith and so on in this field of horse racing, which has turned itself into the height of the forge of hadith. This view of Muawiya shows his rightfulness and less of his bias towards the majority of Sunni scholars. Issue Subsequent letters to his agents, in a four-stage policy, with the help of some Companions and followers, first left the people touched by the virtues of Ahlulbayt (AS), and Forbade them from communicating with them, then tried to isolate them from the Shiites, so they ordered not to let them go public and even deny their testimony. In the third stage, the enemies of Ahlul-Bayt (as) and the Umayyad were dominated by sensitive executive and promotional posts, and ordered the curse of Ahlul-Bayt (AS), and in the fourth stage prepared the conditions for killing and killing Shiites. Could completely deprive Ahlulbayt of the achievement of the government and completely fix it in the Umayyad. The most motivated motivation of Mu'awiyyah in forging the hadith from Ibn'Abi al-Haidan's point of view was to gain religious legitimacy, and to do this, hadiths in virtue Himself, the Umayyad, Uthman and Sham, the other important motive has been to weaken the opponents, especially the Imam Ali (AS), and have forged some traditions in defaming them and their great father. Is.
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
محسن کریمی
گروه معارف اسلامی دانشگاه ازاد نجف اباد