Muslim Philosophers on the Relation between Metaphysics and Theology

سال انتشار: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: فارسی
مشاهده: 369

فایل این مقاله در 14 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_PFK-21-81_007

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 7 خرداد 1399

چکیده مقاله:

Muslim Philosopherson the Relation between Metaphysics and Theology Mohammad Saeedimehr* Received: 01/07/2019     |       Accepted: 05/09/2019 In different parts of Metaphysics, Aristotle presents different (and apparently, conflicting) views on the nature and subject matter of the discipline in question. These different characterizations led to wide-ranging interpretations of the relation between metaphysics and philosophical theology. Muslim Philosophers adopted two different views. Al-Kindi and al-Farabi (in some of his works) endorsed the view that metaphysics is the same as theology as far as its subject matter is the First Cause (God) and it deals essentially with incorporeal entities. After Avicenna, however, a second view became dominant according to which metaphysics has a broader realm that embraces theology as its most noble part. The rationale behind this view is that the subject matter of metaphysics is being qua being , or unconditioned existent, in its broad sense so that philosophical theology can be taken as discussing some of the proper accidents of the unconditioned existent. This view requires that metaphysics cannot be a secular discipline and should be totally consistent with theology. It also provides us with a certain interpretation of what is usually called Islamic philosophy.   * Professor. Department of Philosophy, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran. Iran. ׀         saeedi@modares.ac.ir Saeedimehr, M. (2019). Muslim Philosophers on the Relation between Metaphysics and Theology. The Journal of Philosophical-Theological Research, 21(81), 103۔ 118. doi: 10.22091/jptr.2019.4723.2201

نویسندگان

محمد سعیدی مهر

استاد تمام گروه فلسفه دانشگاه تربیت مدرس

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Adamson, P. (2018). Al-Kindi. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The ...
  • Al-Farabi. (1405a AH). Fusul al-Muntaze‘ah. (Edited and commented by Fuzi ...
  • Al-Farabi. (1405b AH). Al-Jam‘ bayn Ra’y al-Hakimayn, Introduction and Comments ...
  • Al-Farabi. (1986). Kitab al-Huruf (The Book of Letters). introduction and ...
  • Al-Kindi. (1974). Fi al-Falsafa al-Ula (Al-Kindi’s Metaphysics). Translated with introduction and ...
  • Aristotle. (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle, The Revised Oxford ...
  • Avicenna. (1326 AH). Risalah fi Aqsam al-‘Ulum al-‘Aqliyah. In Tisa‘ ...
  • Avicenna. (1973). Danishnama-i ‘Alai. Translated by Parviz Morewedge as The Metaphysica ...
  • Avicenna. (1980). ‘Uyun al-Hikmah. Introduction by Abd al-Rahman Badawi. Bairut: ...
  • Avicenna. (2005). Al-Ilahiyyaat min Al-Shifa’, (The Metaphysics of Healing). Translated, ...
  • Bertolacci, A. (2006). The Reception of Aristotle s Metaphysics in ...
  • Gohlman, W.E. (1974). The Life of Ibn Sina. Albany, NY: SUNY ...
  • McGinnis, J. & Reisman D. C. (Eds.). (2007). Classical Arabic Philosophy: ...
  • Shirazi, S. M. (Mulla Sadra). (1354 SH). Al-Mabda’ wa Al-Ma‘aad. ...
  • Shirazi, S. M. (Mulla Sadra). (1981). Al-Hikmat al-Muta‘aliyah fi al-Asfar ...
  • Shirazi, S. M. (Mulla Sadra). (2001). Sharh al-Hidaya al-Athiriyya. M.M. Fuladkar ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع