Comparison of Construction Discourse and Justice in Relation to Collective Housing

Collective housing is an emerging phenomenon in the contemporary world that has been able to provide a wide range of societal demands and accommodate a wide range of social groups. Following the Islamic Revolution, contemporary Iranian architecture has arisen in the framework of the republic's political discourse. The government's position on the development of mass and social housing is based on the Islamic Revolution's major priority from an economic standpoint. This study was created with the goal of separating the building and justice discourses and assessing the factor contribution of each discourse on the dimensions of community housing. The research approach is a nested blend of qualitative and exploratory quantitative research that first defines the sorts of discourses before observing the communal housing complexes in each time and their repercussions (disadvantages, benefits). Then, based on the observations of the discourses, ۳۸۴ space users are given a questionnaire with a Likert scale to evaluate the efficacy of the outcomes. In EnViews software, the findings are examined using inferential statistics. The findings show that constructive discourse has the most impact on outcomes; the elimination of some domestic activities has left the standardization and disregard for ecology with a value of (۱,۰۰۰) with least impact on rent provided ownership with a value of (۰.۲۵۸), but has the greatest impact in the justice-oriented period. The discourse of beauty and integrity, with a value of (۱,۰۰۰) has the most influence and the least impact on the discourse of marginalized people, a significant fall in construction quality, acceleration of building, and underutilized areas (۰.۱۱۶).

کلیدواژه ها:

Construction Discourse ، Justice-Oriented Discourse ، Collective Housing ، Hybrid Method