The influence of using different reconstruction algorithms on sensitivity of quantitative 18F-FDG-PET volumetric measures to background activity variation

سال انتشار: 1397
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 351

فایل این مقاله در 11 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IRJNM-26-2_004

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 19 بهمن 1398

چکیده مقاله:

Introduction: This study aims to investigate the influence of background activity variation on image quantification in differently reconstructed PET/CT images. Methods: Measurements were performed on a Discovery-690 PET/CT scanner using a custom-built NEMA-like phantom. A background activity level of 5.3 and 2.6 kBq/ml 18F-FDG were applied. Images were reconstructed employing four different reconstruction algorithms: HD (OSEM with no PSF or TOF), PSF only, TOF only, and TOFPSF, with Gaussian filters of 3 and 6.4 mm in FWHM. SUVmax and SUVpeak were obtained and used as cut-off thresholding; Metabolic Tumor Volume (MTV) and Total Lesion Glycolysis (TLG) were measured. The volume recovery coefficients (VRCs), the relative percent error (ΔMTV), and Dice similarity coefficient were assessed with respect to true values. Results:SUVmax and SUVpeak decreased and MTV increased as function of increasing the background dose. The most differences occur in smaller volumes with 3-mm filter; Non-TOF and Non-PSF reconstruction methods were more sensitive to increasing the background activity in the smaller and larger volumes, respectively. The TLG values were affected in the small lesions (decrease up to 12%). In a range of target volumes, differences between the mean ΔMTV in the high and low background dose varied from -11.8% to 7.2% using SUVmax and from 2.1% to 7.6% using SUVpeak inter reconstruction methods. Conclusion: The effect of the background activity variation on SUV-based quantification in small lesion was more noticeable than large lesion. The HD and TOFPSF algorithms had the lowest and the highest sensitivity to background activity, respectively.

نویسندگان

Ali Ketabi

Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran|Research Center for Molecular and Cellular Imaging, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Pardis Ghafarian

Chronic Respiratory Diseases Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran|PET/CT and Cyclotron Center, Masih Daneshvari Hospital, Shahid Beheshti

Mohammad Amin Mosleh-Shirazi

Medical Imaging Research Center and Physics Unit, Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Namazi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Seyed Rabi Mahdavi

Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST ...
  • Thorwarth D, Geets X, Paiusco M. Physical radiotherapy treatment planning ...
  • Tofilon PJ, Camphausen K. Increasing the therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy: ...
  • Lucignani G. SUV and segmentation: pressing challenges in tumour assessment ...
  • Oh JR, Seo JH, Chong A, Min JJ, Song HC, ...
  • Lee JW, Kang CM, Choi HJ, Lee WJ, Song SY, ...
  • Sheikhbahaei S, Marcus C, Subramaniam RM. 18F FDG PET/CT and ...
  • Manca G, Vanzi E, Rubello D, Giammarile F, Grassetto G, ...
  • Larson SM, Erdi Y, Akhurst T, Mazumdar M, Macapinlac HA, ...
  • d Amico A. Review of clinical practice utility of positron ...
  • Mac Manus MP, Everitt S, Bayne M, Ball D, Plumridge ...
  • Pan T, Mawlawi O. PET/CT in radiation oncology. Med Phys. ...
  • Shi X, Meng X, Sun X, Xing L, Yu J. ...
  • Grégoire V, Langendijk JA, Nuyts S. Advances in Radiotherapy for ...
  • Ling CC, Humm J, Larson S, Amols H, Fuks Z, ...
  • Bentzen SM. Theragnostic imaging for radiation oncology: dose-painting by numbers. ...
  • Lu W, Wang J, Zhang HH. Computerized PET/CT image analysis ...
  • Peeken JC, Nüsslin F, Combs SE. Radio-oncomics : The potential ...
  • Zhang H, Tan S, Chen W, Kligerman S, Kim G, ...
  • Doot RK, McDonald ES, Mankoff DA. Role of PET quantitation ...
  • Xu W, Yu S, Ma Y, Liu C, Xin J. ...
  • Berthon B, Evans M, Marshall C, Palaniappan N, Cole N, ...
  • Sridhar P, Mercier G, Tan J, Truong MT, Daly B, ...
  • Zaidi H, El Naqa I. PET-guided delineation of radiation therapy ...
  • Rogasch JM, Hofheinz F, Lougovski A, Furth C, Ruf J, ...
  • Brendle C, Kupferschläger J, Nikolaou K, la Fougère C, Gatidis ...
  • Knudtsen IS, van Elmpt W, Ollers M, Malinen E. Impact ...
  • Soret M, Bacharach SL, Buvat I. Partial-volume effect in PET ...
  • Chen GH, Yao ZF, Fan XW, Zhang YJ, Gao HQ, ...
  • Foster B, Bagci U, Mansoor A, Xu Z, Mollura DJ1. ...
  • Andersen FL, Klausen TL, Loft A, Beyer T, Holm S. ...
  • Prieto E, Domínguez-Prado I, García-Velloso MJ, Peñuelas I, Richter JÁ, ...
  • Sheikhbahaei S, Marcus C, Wray R, Rahmim A, Lodge MA, ...
  • Lee NY, Riaz N, Lu JJ. Target volume delineation for ...
  • Hanna GG, Hounsell AR, O Sullivan JM. Geometrical analysis of ...
  • Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJ, Giammarile F, Tatsch K, ...
  • Zou KH, Warfield SK, Bharatha A, Tempany CMC, Kaus MR, ...
  • Sadick M, Molina F, Frey S, Piniol R, Sadick H, ...
  • Schaefer A, Kremp S, Hellwig D, Rübe C, Kirsch CM, ...
  • Burger IA, Vargas HA, Beattie BJ, Goldman DA, Zheng J, ...
  • Burger IA, Casanova R, Steiger S, Husmann L, Stolzmann P, ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع