Comparison the retention of implant frameworks fabricated by three different method of waxing including CAD/CAM, Rapid prototyping and conventional techniques
- سال انتشار: 1398
- محل انتشار: اولین کنگره دانشجویی دندانپزشکی شمال کشور
- کد COI اختصاصی: NORTHDENT01_101
- زبان مقاله: انگلیسی
- تعداد مشاهده: 319
نویسندگان
Asssociate professor, Prosthetic department, Dentistry school, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Dentist, Graduated from Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
چکیده
Background and Objective: Implant supported Metal-ceramic restorations play an important role in replacing missing teeth. The conventional method of wax pattern fabrication and the inherited disadvantages introduce using alternative methods such as CAD/CAM and Rapid prototyping technologies. This experimental study compares the retention values of copings casted from CAD/CAM, Rapid prototyping and conventional waxing methods.Materials and Methods: Thirty-six Ufit solid abutment analogues of 5.5 mm height were divided randomly into three groups according to the wax-pattern fabrication method (n=12). CAD/CAM milling machine (Cori TEC 450i; imes-icore) was used to fabricate the first group wax-patterns, while 3D printer R66PLUS (Solidscape, Inc.)was applied to fabricate the second group. The third group was fabricated byconventional wax-up method. All wax-patterns were equalized in contour, thickness,and cement space. The copings casted from wax-patterns were finished and polishedthrough standard procedures. Specimens insertions on corresponded abutment wereevaluated and necessary adjustments were performed. Afterwards, the copingscemented to the abutment by zinc phosphate cement. Tensile resistance test was usedto measure retention value by universal testing machine.Findings: The retention mean values were measured 680.36±21.93 N for CAD/CAM group, 440.48±85.98 N for Rapid prototyping group, and 407.23±67.48 N for conventional group. One-way ANOVA test revealed significant differences among the three groups (p< 0.001). Retention value was greater in CAD/CAM group compared to the others (p< 0.001). It also revealed no significant differences between Rapid prototyping and conventional groups (p=0.54).Based on median and interquartile range (IQR) CAD/CAM group needed statistically significant more adjustment comparing with two other groups (P< 0.001). There was no significant difference between RP and conventional group in this subject (P=0.986).Conclusion: Using CAD/CAM technique for wax-pattern fabrication will produce implant supported restorations with higher retention values compared to the conventional method; there is no significant difference between conventional and Rapid prototyping method of wax-pattern fabrication.کلیدواژه ها
Dental implant;Wax pattern; 3D printers; CAD/CAM; Retentionمقالات مرتبط جدید
- Evaluation of Dental Injuries in Iranian Athletes: A Narrative Review
- Expression of Different Tumor Biomarkers in Oral Lichen Planus: A Meta-analysis
- Evaluation of the Effects of Using Buccal Fat Pad on Dorsum Changes: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- Diagnostic Strategies for Early Detection of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Review Article
- The Effect of Non-surgical Periodontal Treatment on the Quality of Life of Patients With Moderate to Severe Periodontitis
اطلاعات بیشتر در مورد COI
COI مخفف عبارت CIVILICA Object Identifier به معنی شناسه سیویلیکا برای اسناد است. COI کدی است که مطابق محل انتشار، به مقالات کنفرانسها و ژورنالهای داخل کشور به هنگام نمایه سازی بر روی پایگاه استنادی سیویلیکا اختصاص می یابد.
کد COI به مفهوم کد ملی اسناد نمایه شده در سیویلیکا است و کدی یکتا و ثابت است و به همین دلیل همواره قابلیت استناد و پیگیری دارد.