COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES FOR NUMERICAL RESERVOIR SIMULATION

سال انتشار: 1387
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 1,859

فایل این مقاله در 12 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

NICEC12_531

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 30 شهریور 1387

چکیده مقاله:

Many physical processes in nature, whose correct understanding, prediction, and control are important to people, are described by Partial Differential Algebraic Equation (PDAE) systems as a set of Partial Differential, Ordinary Differential and Algebraic Equations. Multiphase flow in porous media, as one of such physical process, has been the interest of many scientific researchers especially in the field of reservoir engineering. For most PDAEs it is not possible to find their exact solutions analytically as mathematical function. Therefore the only way to solve PDAEs arising in scientific problems is to approximate their solutions numerically and as first step Partial (and Ordinary) Differential Equations of a given PDAE should be discretized with suitable technique into a set of nonlinear (or linear) equations. Different discretization techniques such as finite volume, finite element and finite difference applicable to numerical analysis of PDAE system governing multiphase flow in porous media have been reviewed and compared in this paper by using several case studies .

نویسندگان

Nourollah Kasiri

۱Chemical Engineering Department, Iran University of Science & Technology

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Trujillo, D., Quettier, L.1997. Comparison of Finite Volume schemes for ...
  • Barenblatt, G.E., Zheltov, I.P., and Kochina, I.N., 1960. Basic concepts ...
  • Nicholas, J. H., 1996. Accuracy and Stability of Numerical Algorithms, ...
  • Coats, K.H., 1973. Use and Misuse of Reservoir Simulation Models, ...
  • Moridis, G.J., Holditch, S.A., Reddell, D.L., 1994. The Laplace Transform ...
  • Wycoff, R.D., Botset H.G., Muskat, M. 1933. The Mechanics of ...
  • Crick, M., Adamson, G., Gane, B., 1996. Simulation throughout the ...
  • Firoozabadi, A., Hoteit, 2007. H. Numerical Simulation of complex Reservoir ...
  • Jessen, K., Stemby, E.H., 2002. Interplay of Phase Behavior and ...
  • Todd, M.R., O'Dell, P.M., Hirasaki, G.J. 1972. Methods for Increased ...
  • Wolcott, D.S., Kazemi, H., 1996. A practical Method for Minimizing ...
  • Lantz, R.B., 1971. Quantitative Evaluation of Numerical Diffusion (Truncation Error), ...
  • Dom browski, N., 1993. Know the CFD Code, Chemical Engineering ...
  • Ertekin, T., Abo u-Kassem _ J.H., King, G.R., 2001. Basic ...
  • Guo, B., Wang, X. 2005. Testing of New High-Order Finite ...
  • Brand, C.W., Heinemann, J.E., Aziz, K., 1991.The Grid Orientation Effect ...
  • Kazemi, H., Ostebo, B., 1991. Mixed Five-Point Nine-Point Fi n ...
  • Rosenberg, D.U., 1982. Local Mesh Refinement for Finite Difference Methods, ...
  • Mal alasekera, W., Versteeg H.K., 1995. An introduction to Com ...
  • Eymard, R., Sonier, F., 1994. Mathe matical and Numerical Properties ...
  • Quandalle, P., 1993. Eighth SPE Comparative Solution Project: gridding Techniques ...
  • Robert, E., Fernand, S., 1994. Mathemati cal and Numerical Properties ...
  • Blunt, M. J., Christie, M. A., 2001. Tenth SPE Comparative ...
  • Durlofsky, L.J., 2007. Multiscale Mixed Finite Element Modeling of Coupled ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع