Radial Collector Well Empirical Equations Comparison

سال انتشار: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 585

فایل این مقاله در 12 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ICSDA02_136

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 9 مرداد 1395

چکیده مقاله:

Groundwater is often a relatively reliable, clean, and safe source of water supply. However, in some locations, including sites in arid and semiarid regions, the aquifer saturated thickness maybe insufficient for vertical tube wells to extract desired water rates. Radial Collector (RC) wells are advantageous for obtaining sustained groundwater yield from thin aquifers located near hydraulically connected surface water. An RC well abstracts groundwater with less drawdownat the well casing than usually occurs at a traditional vertical well extracting the same pumping rate. An RC well consists of a central caisson from which multiple horizontal lateral lines extend horizontally. Available steady-state analytical solutions differ in assumptions, situationalsuitability, and accuracy. Applying numerical simulation models (finite difference, finite element, and analytic element), to compute RC head response to pumping also involvessimplifying assumptions that impact accuracy. The empirical equation of Patel et al. seems most accurate of all empirical and analytical equations. Assume an RC well located 100-350 m from a river, in a shallow unconfined aquifer having 8-15 m saturated thickness of unconsolidatedsand and gravel of hydraulic conductivity equal to or exceeding 500 m/d. Assume the RC well has a 3-m caisson radius, 24 symmetrically placed laterals, lateral lengths of 35-100 meters, and total steady pumping not exceeding 250 liters per second. The Patel Equation computes caisson head about 4 % higher than heads computed by a numerical analytic element (AEM) model. For the same range of situations, the McWhorter and Sunada (M&S) Equation computes heads less than 2.6 % greater than the Patel Equation. Having a total error of less than seven percent is good news of well designers experienced in using the Thiem Equation. The M&S Equation is based upon the Thiem Equation, and comparably easy to use.

کلیدواژه ها:

Radial Collector well ، unconsolidated and unconfined aquifer ، Ranney well

نویسندگان

S Masoudiashtiani

PhD Candidate, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Utah State University, USA.,

R. C. Peralta

Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Utah State University, USA.,

M. E. Banihabib

Associate Professor and Head, Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, College of Aburaihan, University of Tehran, Iran.,

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Bakker M, Kelson VA, Luther KH. Multilayer analytic element modeling ...
  • Ball DF, Herbert R. The Use and Performance of Collector ...
  • Haitjema H, Kuzin S, Kelson V, Abrams D. Modeling Flow ...
  • Huisman L. Groundwater Recovery, The Macmillan Press LTD, London and ...
  • McWhorter DB, Sunada, DK. Groundwater hydrology and hydraulics, Water Resources ...
  • Milojevic M. Radial collector wels adjacent to the riverbank Journal ...
  • Moore R, Kelson V, Wittman J, Rash V. A Modeling ...
  • Patel HM, Eldho TI, Rastogi AK. Simulation of Radial Collector ...
  • USGS. Basic Ground-Water Hydrology, Water-Supply Paper 220 (eighth Printing). Denver, ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع