Ethical Conflicts in Compulsory Arbitration with the Right to Action and Judicial Justice

  • سال انتشار: 1403
  • محل انتشار: مجله بین المللی اخلاق و جامعه، دوره: 6، شماره: 1
  • کد COI اختصاصی: JR_IJETH-6-1_004
  • زبان مقاله: انگلیسی
  • تعداد مشاهده: 27
دانلود فایل این مقاله

نویسندگان

Afsaneh Garshasbi

Ph.D. Student in Law, Kish International Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kish Island, Iran

Jalil Maleki

Department of Law, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Mojtaba Asgharian

Department of International Law, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Kharazmi University, Alborz, Iran

چکیده

Introduction: Arbitration has a contractual nature and is subject to the sovereignty of the will of the parties, but in some cases, the legislator imposed the referral of claims to arbitration on the will of the parties and caused the contractual nature of the arbitration clause to disappear or be limited. By doing this, he has placed the arbitration outside the will of the parties. This issue causes some moral conflicts in the discussion of compulsory arbitration. Therefore, this research has been done with the purpose of examining the position of compulsory arbitration in Iran's legal system and the ethical challenges in it with a descriptive-analytical approach. Material and Methods: The research was a review method, in order to achieve the goal of the research, in addition to electronic education books and virtual education in this field, articles related to the research keywords from ۲۰۰۴ to ۲۰۲۲ from the databases of Civilica, Magiran, Sid, Researchgate, Science direct, was reviewed Conclusion: Based on the findings of the research, it can be concluded that compulsory arbitration in Iran has ethical challenges in the field of implementation and interpretation, the most important of which is the issue of the right to action and judicial justice. In the context of ambiguities in mandatory arbitration, even if the method of arbitration becomes ambiguous, the arbitrator has the duty to find out the will of the legislator with the principles and rules of interpretation, which creates a moral conflict for the arbitrator.

کلیدواژه ها

Ethics, Compulsory arbitration, Arbitrary arbitration, Code of ethics

اطلاعات بیشتر در مورد COI

COI مخفف عبارت CIVILICA Object Identifier به معنی شناسه سیویلیکا برای اسناد است. COI کدی است که مطابق محل انتشار، به مقالات کنفرانسها و ژورنالهای داخل کشور به هنگام نمایه سازی بر روی پایگاه استنادی سیویلیکا اختصاص می یابد.

کد COI به مفهوم کد ملی اسناد نمایه شده در سیویلیکا است و کدی یکتا و ثابت است و به همین دلیل همواره قابلیت استناد و پیگیری دارد.