Comparative Study on Different Machine Learning Algorithms for Neonatal Diabetes Detection
- سال انتشار: 1403
- محل انتشار: فصلنامه مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، دوره: 16، شماره: 1
- کد COI اختصاصی: JR_JITM-16-1_001
- زبان مقاله: انگلیسی
- تعداد مشاهده: 31
نویسندگان
Saveetha School of Law, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai-۷۷, India.
Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, IGNOU, New Delhi, India.
Department of Electrical Engineering, SVKMs Institute of Technology, Dhule, M.S. ۴۲۴۰۰۲, India.
CDOE, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India.
School of Engineering, Sree Vidyanikethan Engineering College, Andra Pradesh, India.
Faculty of Economics and Business, Universities Jambi, Indonesia.
چکیده
This paper gives a performance analysis of multiple vote classifiers based on meta-classification methods for estimating the risk of diabetes. The study's dataset includes a number of biological and clinical risk variables that can result in the development of diabetes. In the analysis, classifiers like Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machines, and Artificial Neural Networks were used. In the study, each classifier was trained and evaluated separately, and the outcomes were compared to those attained using meta-classification methods. Some of the meta-classifiers used in the analysis included Majority Voting, Weighted Majority Voting, and Stacking. The effectiveness of each classifier was evaluated using a number of measures, including accuracy, precision, recall, F۱-score, and Area under the Curve (AUC). The results show that meta-classification techniques often outperform solo classifiers in terms of prediction precision. Random Forest and Gradient Boosting, two different classifiers, had the highest accuracy, while Logistic Regression performed the worst. The best performing meta-classifier was stacking, which achieved an accuracy of ۸۴.۲۵%. Weighted Majority Voting came in second (۸۳.۸۶%) and Majority Voting came in third (۸۲.۹۵%).کلیدواژه ها
Voting Classifiers, Meta-Classification Technique, Diabetes Risk Prediction, Biomedical, Clinical Risk Factors, Random forest, Logistic regression, Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machinesاطلاعات بیشتر در مورد COI
COI مخفف عبارت CIVILICA Object Identifier به معنی شناسه سیویلیکا برای اسناد است. COI کدی است که مطابق محل انتشار، به مقالات کنفرانسها و ژورنالهای داخل کشور به هنگام نمایه سازی بر روی پایگاه استنادی سیویلیکا اختصاص می یابد.
کد COI به مفهوم کد ملی اسناد نمایه شده در سیویلیکا است و کدی یکتا و ثابت است و به همین دلیل همواره قابلیت استناد و پیگیری دارد.