Comparison of the Effect of Lecture and Group Discussion on Health Workers’ Knowledge and Attitudes about Asthma Based on the IraPEN Program
- سال انتشار: 1401
- محل انتشار: مجله گام های توسعه در آموزش پزشکی، دوره: 19، شماره: 1
- کد COI اختصاصی: JR_SDME-19-1_003
- زبان مقاله: انگلیسی
- تعداد مشاهده: 120
نویسندگان
M.Sc. of Community-Based Education in the Health System, Education Development Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
HIV/STI Surveillance Research Center, WHO Collaborating Center for HIV Surveillance, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
Management and Leadership in Medical Education Research Center, Department of Health Information Sciences, School of Management and Medical Information Sciences, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
چکیده
Background: The group discussion method is one of the student-centered and active teaching methods in which learners actively participate in educational activities using discussion, and they are given the opportunity to share their opinions and experiences with others.Objectives: The present study was conducted to compare the effects of the group discussion method and the lecture method on health workers’ knowledge and attitudes.Methods: In this quasi-experimental study, ۷۰ health workers working in Baft, Kerman province, were selected by census method and divided into two groups of ۳۵ people. Asthma-related educational content was presented for one group as a lecture and the other as a group discussion. Before and after the intervention, health workers’ knowledge and attitudes scores were evaluated and compared using a researcher-made questionnaire.Results: The mean age of participants was ۳۸ ± ۲.۷ years. After the intervention, the mean score of attitude was ۶۵.۸۶ ± ۶ in the lecture group and ۶۸.۶۶ ± ۴.۷ in the group discussion group, indicating a significant difference (p = ۰.۰۴). The mean score of knowledge after the intervention was ۱۱.۴ ± ۱.۶۶ in the lecture group and ۱۱.۲۸ ± ۱.۶ in the group discussion group, which was not statistically significant (p = ۰.۷۷). In both groups, the mean scores of knowledge and attitude increased significantly after the intervention (p< ۰.۰۰۰۱).Conclusion: The results showed that education affected the increase of health workers’ knowledge and attitudes in both groups. Also, the group discussion method had a greater effect on increasing the attitude of individuals compared to the lecture method; however, this effect was not significant for knowledge. Therefore, it can be concluded that for the training of health workers, it is better to use integrated teaching methods to create deep and efficient learning as well as positive attitude and motivation.کلیدواژه ها
lecture, Group discussion, Knowledge, Attitude, Asthmaاطلاعات بیشتر در مورد COI
COI مخفف عبارت CIVILICA Object Identifier به معنی شناسه سیویلیکا برای اسناد است. COI کدی است که مطابق محل انتشار، به مقالات کنفرانسها و ژورنالهای داخل کشور به هنگام نمایه سازی بر روی پایگاه استنادی سیویلیکا اختصاص می یابد.
کد COI به مفهوم کد ملی اسناد نمایه شده در سیویلیکا است و کدی یکتا و ثابت است و به همین دلیل همواره قابلیت استناد و پیگیری دارد.