Zahra Zahedi - Student Research Committee, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
Hamid Salehiniya - Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
Afagh Zarei - Department of Medical Education, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Hamid Abbaszadeh - Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran

Background: Due to the widespread utilization of electronic exams, neglecting their quality is a major threat. Assessing the quality of electronic exams plays a decisive role in determining the efficacy of electronic learning.Objectives: This study aimed to assess the quality of electronic exams held at the beginning of the coronavirus disease ۲۰۱۹ outbreak.Methods: Following a cross-sectional design, this study included all electronic exams of the electronic test center of Birjand University of Medical Sciences during the academic year of ۲۰۲۰. Reliability, discrimination index (DI), and difficulty index (DIF) of exams were used to assess the quality.  Descriptive statistics and frequency distributions were used to describe the data.Results: Out of ۱۰۱ E-exams, ۵۹.۴% had appropriate DIF, ۶۱.۴% had low DI, and ۶۶.۳% had unfavorable reliability. Also, ۳۸.۶% of exams had high DIF (easy questions). For all exams, the mean of DIF, DI, and reliability was ۰.۶۶±۰.۱۴, ۰.۲۸±۰.۰۸, and ۰.۵۶±۰.۳۱, respectively. The mean of DI (P= ۰.۳۰) and reliability (P= ۰.۰۹) was not significantly different based on faculty. The mean of DIF was significantly different according to the faculty (P=۰.۰۳).Conclusion: Concerning the quality of e-exams, most problems are related to the DI and reliability. It is recommended to hold empowerment workshops on how to design exam questions for faculty members to get them acquainted with strategies to increase the reliability and discrimination index of the exam.

Assessment, Electronic, Quality, evaluation, Analysis