Comparative CBCT Assessment of Obturation Quality in Different Obturation Techniques

سال انتشار: 1401
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 196

فایل این مقاله در 9 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JDMT-11-2_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 11 تیر 1401

چکیده مقاله:

Introduction: Different techniques and materials have been introduced over time to improve the quality of root canal treatment. This study aimed to compare the quality of root canal obturation using three root canal obturation techniques based on the existing void using cone beam computed tomography imaging techniques. Methods: Thirty-three single canal teeth were selected and the root canals were prepared. The roots were obturated with single-cone, lateral compaction with cold gutta-percha, and vertical compaction techniques. Afterward, the roots were scanned, and the presence of voids in the ۱-, ۳-, ۵-, and ۷-mm sections of the root apex was investigated, and then the area and volume of voids were calculated by Mimics ۱۰.۰۱ software. Results: The highest percentage of voids presence in all groups was detected in the ۷-mm section of the apex (۶۰.۶%) , while the lowest percentage was found in the ۱-mm section of the apex (۱۲.۱%). Conclusion: There was no significant difference between the three techniques evaluated in this study in terms of void size, void volume, and obturation quality. Voids were present in all samples. Considering the technique used to obturate the root canals, voids were different in terms of shape and volume

نویسندگان

Vahid Zand

Professor, Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz, Iran.

Amin Salem Milani

Associate Professor, Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz, Iran

Pardis Tehranchi

Assistant Professor, Department of Operative and Esthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tabriz Azad University of Medical Science, Tabriz, Iran

Sabete Bagheri Sabzevar

Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

Omid Goudarzi

Private Practice, Tabriz, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Dumani A, Yilmaz S, Yoldas O, Kuden C. Evaluation of ...
  • Krug R, Krastl G, Jahreis M. Technical quality of a ...
  • Saunders W, Saunders E. Coronal leakage as a cause of ...
  • Agrafioti A, Koursoumis AD, Kontakiotis EG. Re-establishing apical patency after ...
  • Madhuri GV, Varri S, Bolla N, Mandava P, Akkala LS, ...
  • J Conserv Dent. ۲۰۱۶;۱۹(۵):۴۶۱-۴۶۴ ...
  • Polineni S, Bolla N, Mandava P, Vemuri S, Mallela M, ...
  • Aminsobhani M, Ghorbanzadeh A, Sharifian MR, Namjou S, Kharazifard MJ. ...
  • Schäfer E, Nelius B, Bürklein S. A comparative evaluation of ...
  • Xu H, Qiu X, Zhang G, Zhang F. Evaluation of ...
  • Huybrechts B, Bud M, Bergmans L, Lambrechts P, Jacobs R. ...
  • Zaslansky P, Fratzl P, Rack A, Wu MK, Wesselink P, ...
  • Hammad M, Qualtrough A, Silikas N. Evaluation of root canal ...
  • Angerame D, De Biasi M, Pecci R, Bedini R, Tommasin ...
  • Long W, Li J, Liu Y, Jiang H. Effect of ...
  • Neuhaus K, Schick A, Lussi A. Apical filling characteristics of ...
  • Wang Y, Liu S, Dong Y. In vitro study of ...
  • Maryam Janani; Negin Ghasemi; Masoumeh Johari; Leila Nazari. Comparison of ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع