CIVILICA We Respect the Science
(ناشر تخصصی کنفرانسهای کشور / شماره مجوز انتشارات از وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی: ۸۹۷۱)

Comparison of the Salmonella enterica subsp. LT۲ metabolic model in biochemical databases

عنوان مقاله: Comparison of the Salmonella enterica subsp. LT۲ metabolic model in biochemical databases
شناسه ملی مقاله: IBIS10_209
منتشر شده در اولین همایش بین المللی و دهمین همایش ملی بیوانفورماتیک ایران در سال 1400
مشخصات نویسندگان مقاله:

Sajjad Gharaghani - Assistant Professor, Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics (IBB), Department of Bioinformatics, Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Drug Design (LBD), University of Tehran
Shiva Beigizadeh - Dept. of Biostatistics, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran

خلاصه مقاله:
Metabolic models include the description of all biochemical reactions, metabolites, and metabolism genesfor a particular organism, biochemical, genetic, and genomic knowledge. We analyzed five biochemicaldatabases (Bigg, KEGG, SEED, PATRIC, and BIOCYC) commonly used for metabolic modeling andperformed pairwise comparisons to examine compatibility, incompatibility, and ambiguity of reactions,metabolites, and genes between databases. Salmonella enterica subsp. LT۲ that there's a metabolic model forit in the Bigg database. (ID BIGG: STM_v۱_۰) The SEED model is also the primary source of genomicscalemetabolic models based on microbial or plant annotation genomes. We created the metabolic model ofour reference genome using the Model SEED web server and reconstructed it in the PATRIC metabolicdatabase. (PATRIC Database ID: ۹۹۲۸۷.۱) We compared the Bigg and Seed metabolic models for the numberof reactions, metabolites, and genes. The Seed model had ۱۶۴۶ reactions, ۱۷۲۶ metabolites, and ۹۵۸ genes,and the Bigg model had ۲۵۴۵ reactions, ۱۸۰۲ metabolites, and ۱۲۷۱ genes. There were ۱۹۳۵ reactions and۱۵۴۷ metabolites in the Seed model that were not presented in the Bigg model, and conversely, there were۱۰۷۳ reactions and ۹۵۱ metabolites in the Bigg model that were not presented in the Seed model. In theSEED database, our organism had ۵۶۶ subsystems and in the PATRIC database, it had ۳۴۴ subsystems. Tofind functional proteins that are in the metabolic pathway but are not in the PATRIC database, we searchedfor organisms in the KEGG database.Conclusion: Each database uses its own naming space; when different tools are used, the same metabolitesand reactions may have different naming conventions. It is now recommended to use unique identifiers,independent of the specific databases used or referred to different namespaces. Also, manual verification ofmaps is a useful solution to eliminate inconsistencies while combining the models.

کلمات کلیدی:
databases, incompatibility, name ambiguity, chemical nomenclature

صفحه اختصاصی مقاله و دریافت فایل کامل: https://civilica.com/doc/1473664/