An Investigation of Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers as Persuasive Strategies in Donald Trump’s ۲۰۱۶ Campaign Speeches

سال انتشار: 1399
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 120

فایل این مقاله در 14 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_CLCS-2-2_007

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 23 دی 1400

چکیده مقاله:

Interpersonal metadiscourse is considered as a significant mean of smoothing communication between the speaker/writer and listener/reader. The present study intends to explore the concept and type of interpersonal metadiscourse markers employed by Donald Trump’s campaign speeches as a persuasive strategy. Descriptive qualitative research design is used in the present study. Dafouz’s (۲۰۰۸) classification of interpersonal metadiscourse markers was employed to analyze the gathered data. The results revealed that Trump made use of all categories of interpersonal metadiscourse markers namely hedges, certainty markers, attributors, attitude markers, and commentaries, in his campaign speeches. The frequency of attitude markers and commentaries was more than other types of metadiscourse markers in Trump’s campaign speech, which demonstrates that he attempted to persuade the public to vote for him through making an emotional link.

نویسندگان

Parisa Etemadfar

PhD Candidate of TEFL, Department of English, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran

Ehsan Namaziandost

PhD in TEFL, Department of English, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Abdollahzadeh, Esmaeel. “Poring Over the Findings: Interpersonal Authorial Engagement in ...
  • Blagojevic, Savka. “Metadiscourse in Academic Prose: A Contrastive Study of ...
  • “The Pragmatic Role of Textual and Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers in ...
  • Dahl, Trine. “Textual Metadiscourse in Research Articles: A Marker of ...
  • Dehkordi, Mojdeh Ebrahimi and Hamid Allami. “Evidentiality in Academic Writing.” ...
  • Esmer, Elçin. “Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers in Turkish Election Rally Speeches ...
  • Estaji, Masoomeh, and Roya Vafaeimehr. “A Comparative Analysis of Interactional ...
  • Hu, Guangwei, and Cao, Feng. “Hedging and boosting in abstracts ...
  • “Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse.” ...
  • “Persuasion, Interaction, and the Construction of Knowledge: Representing Self and ...
  • Gender Differences in the Use of Lexical Hedges in Academic Spoken Language among Iranian EFL Learners: A Comparative Study [مقاله ژورنالی]
  • Gender differences in the use of lexical hedges in academic ...
  • Noorian, Mina, and Reza Biria. “Interpersonal Metadiscourse in Persuasive Journalism: ...
  • Reyes, Antonio. “Strategies of Legitimization in Political Discourse: From Words ...
  • Sepehri, Mehrdad, Mehrnnoosh Hajijalili, and Ehsan Namaziandost. “Hedges and Boosters ...
  • Shea, Daniel, and Michael Burton. Campaign Craft, the Strategies, Tactics, ...
  • Sugiyono. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta, ۲۰۱۰ ...
  • Sukma, P. B. “Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers as Persuasive Strategies in ...
  • Takimoto, Masahiro. “A Corpus-Based Analysis of Hedges and Boosters in ...
  • Tse, Polly, and Ken Hyland. “So What Is The Problem ...
  • van Dijk, T. A. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” eds. Deborah Tannen, ...
  • Yang, Yingli. “Exploring Linguistic and Cultural Variations in the Use ...
  • Yipei, Nun, and Liu Lingling. “Investigating the Interpersonal and Textual ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع