The Use of Failure Mode Effects Analysis (FMEA) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Methods to Determine the Most Important Safety Hazards

سال انتشار: 1396
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 153

فایل این مقاله در 5 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_HEHP-6-1_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 20 مرداد 1400

چکیده مقاله:

Aims: Since the occurrence of hazards in the steel industry has often been multiple and complex, the aim of this study was to identify the risk assessment in this industry in order to study the roots and realities of the risks and the causes of their occurrence, as well as to find solutions to reduce these risks. Instruments & Methods: This descriptive-analytical research was conducted in the cement industry in Khorasan Razavi in ۲۰۱۷. FMEA and AHP methods were used to determine the most important safety hazards. The Risk Priority Number (RPN) was obtained from the multiplication of ۳ factors including severity, probability of occurrence, and probability of discovery. Risk tolerance was used for the acceptable and unacceptable risks in the FMEA method. Findings: The fluctuation of the flange and its breakage due to excessive water pressure in the furnace and lack of lighting for installation of the equipment in the furnace had a high risk. In the AHP method, the risk of breaking the flange was due to excessive water pressure in the furnace and lack of lighting to install the equipment in the furnace, which had a higher weight than the other hazards. Conclusion: Although in the developing countries, the use of risk analysis methods with a preventive approach is not common, these problems have been resolved by communicating with the industry by recent studies. It also emphasizes the use of decision-making methods to minimize the impact of judgments on risk assessment.

نویسندگان

F. Golkhani

Occupational Health Department, Public Health School, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

M.R. Ghotbi Ravandi

Occupational Health Department, Public Health School, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

S. Baesmat

Occupational Health Department, Public Health School, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

F. Abasi Balochkhane

Occupational Health Department, Public Health School, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Hola B. General model of accident rate growth in the ...
  • Kawakami T. Human ergology that promotes participatory approach to improving ...
  • Khan FI, Abbasi SA. TORAP- a new tool for conducting ...
  • Rezvani Z, Gholami M. Identifying analysis of occupational hazards in ...
  • Asadi A. The investigation hazards make accidents in an oil ...
  • Crossly B, Williams R. Environmental assessment: Marine fuel storage/distribution and ...
  • Ebrahimzadeh M, Halvani GH, Mortazavi M, Soltani R. Assessment of ...
  • Oldenhof MT, Van Leeuwen JF, Nauta MJ, De Kaste D, ...
  • Xiao N, Huang HZ, Li Y, He L, Jin T. ...
  • Sharma RK, Kumar D, Kumar P. Systematic failure mode effect ...
  • Ale BJM, Bellamy LJ, Baksteen H, Damen M, Goossens LHJ, ...
  • Vidal LA, Marle F, Bocquet JC. Using a delphi process ...
  • Nouri J, Omidvari M, Tehrani MS. Risk assessment and crisis ...
  • Alimohammadi I, Adl J. The comparison of safety level in ...
  • Guimaraes ACF, Lapa CMF. Fuzzy inference to risk assessment on ...
  • Kerketta S, Dash PK, Narayan, LT. Work zone noise levels ...
  • Jozi SA, Ka’bZadeh Sh, Irankhahi M. Safety, health and environmental ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع