The Effect of Reducing Lexical and Syntactic Complexity of Texts on Reading Comprehension

سال انتشار: 1396
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 179

فایل این مقاله در 25 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JTLS-36-3_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 6 اردیبهشت 1400

چکیده مقاله:

The present study investigated the effect of different types of text simplification (i.e., reducing the lexical and syntactic complexity of texts) on reading comprehension of English as a Foreign Language learners (EFL). Sixty female intermediate EFL learners from three intact classes in Tabarestan Language Institute in Tehran participated in the study. The intact classes were assigned to three experimental groups. Moreover, to homogenize the groups, the researchers administered a general proficiency test (TOEFL, ۲۰۰۳) to the participants. The results revealed no significant difference among the groups in general proficiency and reading ability. Then four reading comprehension texts from TOEFL test (۲۰۰۵) were simplified through lexical simplification, syntactic simplification or lexical-syntactic simplification techniques. The simplified texts, along with their reading comprehension (RC) questions, formed the three versions of the post-test, each version contained either lexically, syntactically or lexical-syntactically simplified texts. Each group took one version of the post-test. The scores were analyzed through one-way ANOVA. The results revealed a significant difference among the groups. The post hoc test indicated that the lexical-syntactic simplification group significantly outperformed the lexical simplification group and performed considerably better than the syntactic simplification group. There was no significant difference between the lexical and syntactic simplification groups, although the latter showed better results.

نویسندگان

Mahmood Safari

English Translation Department, Humanities Faculty, Hazrat-e Masoumeh University, Qom, Iran

Mana Mohaghegh Montazeri

Azad University, Qom Branch

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Anani Sarab, M. R., & Karimi, M. (2008). The impact ...
  • Arya, D., Hiebert, E., & Pearson, D. (2011). The effects ...
  • Bernhardt, E. B. (1984). Towards an information processing perspective in ...
  • Blau, E. K. (1982). The effect of syntax on readability ...
  • Brown, R. L. (1987). A comparison of the comprehensibility of ...
  • Cambridge English Vocabulary Profile, available at  http://www.englishprofile.org/wordlists. ...
  • Crossley, S., Allen, D., & McNamara, D. (2011). Text readability ...
  • Crossley, S. A., Allen, D., & McNamara, D. S. (2012). ...
  • Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2016). Text-based recall ...
  • Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ...
  • Gardner, D., & Hansen, E. (2007).Effects of lexical simplification during ...
  • Gass, S. M., & Alvarez Torres, M. J. (2005). Attention ...
  • Ghane, A., Oroji, M. R., & Habibzade, S. M. (2015). ...
  • Hague, S. A., & Scott, R. (1994). Awareness of text ...
  • Johnson, P. (1981). Effects on reading comprehension of language complexity ...
  • Heydari, M., Khodabandehlou, M., & Jahandar, S. (2013). On the ...
  • Keshavarz, M. H., Atai, M. R., & Ahmadi, H. (2007). ...
  • Kirkpatrick, B. (1994). The Oxford paperback thesaurus. Oxford: Oxford University ...
  • Klare, G. R. (1974). Assessing readability. Reading Research Quarterly, 10, ...
  • Leow, R. (1993). To simplify or not to simplify. Studies ...
  • Long, M. H., & Ross, S. (1993). Modifications that preserve ...
  • Longman dictionary of contemporary English (5th Ed.) (2009). London: Longman.  ...
  • Lucas, M. A. (1991). Systematic grammatical simplification. International Review of ...
  • McDonough, J., Shaw, Ch. Masuhara, H. (2013). Materials and methods ...
  • McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of second language learning. London: Edward ...
  • Moradian, M. R., Naserpoor, A., & Tamri, M. S. (2013).  ...
  • Oh, S. Y. (2001). Two types of input modification and ...
  • Parker, K., & Chaudron, C. (1987). The effects of linguistic ...
  • Rello, L., Baeza-Yates, R., Dempere, L., & Saggion. H. (2013). ...
  • Saggion, H. (2017). Automatic text simplification. Toronto: Morgan & Claypool. ...
  • Shewan, C. & Canter, G. (1971). Effects of vocabulary, syntax ...
  • Shook, D. (1997). Identifying and overcoming possible mismatches in the ...
  • Siddharthan, A. (2004). Syntactic simplification and text cohesion. Technical report, ...
  • Siddharthan, A. (2014). A survey of research on text simplification. ...
  • Sonmez, S. (2007). An overview of studies on the use ...
  • Swaffar, J. K. (1985). Reading authentic texts in a foreign ...
  • Tomlinson, B. (2013). Are materials developing? In B. Tomlinson (Ed), ...
  • Tomlinson, B. & Masuhara, H. (2013). Review of adult EFL ...
  • Tweissi, A. I. (1998). The effects of the amount and ...
  • Ulijn, J. & Strother, J. B. (1990). The effect of ...
  • Widdowson, H. G. (1984). Explorations in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford ...
  • Yano, Y., Long, M., & Ross, S. (1994). The effects ...
  • Young, D. J. (1999). Linguistic simplification of SL reading material: ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع