Investigating Satisfaction Levels of Safety Requirements in Mobile Cranes and its Relationship with Organization’s Safety Culture

سال انتشار: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 175

فایل این مقاله در 7 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_AOH-4-1_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 2 اسفند 1399

چکیده مقاله:

Background: disregarding safety requirements has made accidents of workshop mobile cranes as one of the main factors of injuries and death in civil-industrial projects. Since safety culture considered one of the most important activist indices while investigating the commitment of superior managers and other members of the organization to regard safety requirements, the present study aims at investigating the organization’s safety culture in civil and industrial projects and its relationship with regarding safety requirements of mobile cranes. Methods: the current study is descriptive-analytical and cross-sectional research conducted within 7 civil-industrial projects from 2018 to 2019. To investigate satisfaction levels of safety requirements, 141cranes have been used through a 72-item researcher-made checklist adapted from ASME B30.5 2018 standard and protective regulation of transportation vehicles and moving materials and objects of workshops. The research team has confirmed the validity and reliability of the checklist with CVR=0.68, CVI=0.82, and Cronbach’s alpha=α-0.90. To estimate safety culture levels 677 individuals of staff such as cranes operator, technician, expert, minor managers, middle managers, and superior managers have participated in this study through random sampling method, interview, and completion of safety culture questionnaire. To analyze data Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests, one way ANOVA and linear regression utilizing SPSS v25 have been employed (P-value < 0.05). Results: age average of study individuals equaled with 39.8 and average of their work experiences equaled with 12.29. Results out of this study revealed that there is a positive and meaningful relationship between organizations’ safety culture and consideration levels of safety requirements in mobile cranes. So that parameter of management commitment (0.001), safety preference degree (0.004), staff training (0.012) and information exchange level (0.041) have the most relationship with consideration levels of safety requirements. But there was no meaningful relationship between work conditions and consideration levels of safety requirements (0.075). conclusion: based on results of this study it seems that accidents resultant from mobile cranes occur more in uncommitted organizations so it is important to develop organizations’ safety culture through performance of academic interventions and inform organizations’ staff especially superior management and consequently increase the safety factor of mobile cranes in civil-industrial projects.

نویسندگان

ehsan asivandzadeh

Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Zeynab Jamalizadeh

Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Afshin Mohebi

Department of Hse Management, Tehran Azad University Of Science And Research, Tehran, Iran

Peyman Yari

Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • 1. Asivandzadeh E, Azami K, Jamalizadeh Z. Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders, ...
  • 2. Teixeira LR, Azevedo TM, Bortkiewicz A, da Silva DTC, ...
  • 3. Idrees MD, Hafeez M, Kim J-YJS. Workers’ age and ...
  • 4. Larsson S, Pousette A, Törner M. Psychological climate and ...
  • 5. Guo BH, Yiu TW, González VA. Predicting safety behavior ...
  • 6. Lette A, Ambelu A, Getahun T, Mekonen S. A ...
  • 7. Baldissone G, Comberti L, Bosca S, Murè S. The ...
  • 8. Kim Y, Park J, Park M. Creating a culture ...
  • 9. Asivandzadeh E, Jamalizadeh Z. Evaluation of the impact of ...
  • 10. Cooper MD. Towards a model of safety culture. Safety ...
  • 11. Oah S, Na R, Moon K. The influence of ...
  • 12. Wu C, Li N, Fang D. Leadership improvement and ...
  • 13. Mattson MM, Schwarz UVT, Hellgren J, Hasson H, Tafvelin ...
  • 14. Glendon AI, Clarke S. Human safety and risk management: ...
  • 15. Amponsah-Tawaih K, Adu MA. Work pressure and safety behaviors ...
  • 16. Paolillo A, Silva SA, Pasini M. Promoting safety participation ...
  • 17. Demirkesen S, Arditi D. Construction safety personnel's perceptions of ...
  • 18. Tang DKH, Leiliabadi F, Olugu EU. Factors affecting safety ...
  • 19. Raviv G, Shapira A, Fishbain B. AHP-based analysis of ...
  • 20. Hamid ARA, Azhari R, Zakaria R, Aminudin E, Jaya ...
  • 21. Iran supreme Council of Technical Protection. Protective regulation of ...
  • 22. ASME B30.5 Mobile and Locomotive Cranes. Safety Standard ...
  • 23. Parkestani HN, Alimohammadi I, Arghami S, Ghohari M, Farshad ...
  • 24. Zohar D, Huang Y-h, Lee J, Robertson MM. Testing ...
  • 25. Antonsen S. Safety culture: theory, method and improvement. US: ...
  • 26. Mahdavi SM, editor Creating and reinforcing a culture of ...
  • 27. Rahmati NK, Maneshi HA, Rezaie M, Abbasi M. Evaluation ...
  • 28. Noori A. The effect of working conditions, employment relationships, ...
  • 29. Goodarzi R, Arghami S, Pouyakian M. Identification of factors ...
  • 30. Chib S, Kanetkar M. Safety culture: the buzzword to ...
  • 31. Håvold JI. Safety culture aboard fishing vessels. Safety science. ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع