Narges Vijeh Ravari - Department of General Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Hormozgan, Iran
S.Abdolvahab Samavi - Hormozgan University, Banda Abbas, Iran
Eghbal Zarei - Hormozgan University, Banda Abbas, Iran

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between subjective well-being and quality of life for employees with job performance. The present study is a correlation study. The method of data collection in this field of research is using questionnaires. The sample size of 200 subjects using Cochran s formula was considered that these numbers were selected using simple random sampling. In this study, the following questionnaires were used: Subjective Happiness Scale and PANAS, Job Performance Questionnaire (assessing supervisor) and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire. The results of the analysis showed that: Positive affect components of subjective well-being , quality of life , approximately 5.2 % of the variance is explained , negative affect components of subjective well-being , can explain approximately 1.9% of the variance in quality of life , positive affect components of subjective well-being approximately 5.9 % of the explained variance in job performance to be components of negative affect approximately 2.5 % of the variance in subjective well-being and job performance can explain the components of subjective well-being ( positive affect and negative ) can be simultaneously estimated 6.1 % of the variance in overall quality of life and explained the components of subjective well-being ( negative and positive affect ) can simultaneously altogether approximately 7 % of the variance in job performance explained.

Mental Well-being, Job Performance, Quality of Life