Shortcomings and Benefits of Risk Assessment Techniques in project Risk Management

سال انتشار: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 977

فایل این مقاله در 16 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

این مقاله در بخشهای موضوعی زیر دسته بندی شده است:

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

CAAME01_219

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 19 تیر 1394

چکیده مقاله:

An important measure of any project is its successful completion. There are several opinions regarding project success. One of this options is to use risk management which can decrease the probability of project failure. In a real-life project, various risks exist where they not only prevent a project to be completed within budget and time limit, but could also affect quality, safety and operation. Risk assessment is critical component of risk management because it can effect on project results and consequently on project success. There are various techniques to perform risk analysis. Some of these techniques are qualitative in nature and are flexible enough to be utilized under numerous situations. Qualitative techniques can be applied as a preliminary stage to screen significant risk events. This paper is intended to highlight advantages and disadvantages of each technique in order to define a suitable method based on project situations. The common methods are presented in this paper which are, risk matrix, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Monte Carlo Simulation, Fuzzy Logic, Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) and Fuzzy FMEA. The result of this research can help project manager to achieve much more realistic project objectives.

نویسندگان

Shiva Mansoorzadeh

Department of Industrial Engineering Buein Zahra Technical University, Buien Zahra, Qazvin, Iran

Masoomeh Zeinalnezhad

Department of Industrial Engineering Buein Zahra Technical University, Buien Zahra, Qazvin, Iran

Nader Sheikhi

Bilan Bartar Vosoogh Accounting CO. No ۱۰, Unit ۴, Hafez Impasse, Zare Alley, Razm Joobin St., Kave Blv, Gheitarieh, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Al-Harbi, K.M.(2001). Application of the AHP in Project Management. Intermational ...
  • Abdelgawad, _ and Fayek, A. R. (2010). Risk management in ...
  • AS/NZS (2004), Australian Standards and New Zealand Standards 4360:2004, Risk ...
  • Belton, V., and Gear, T. (1983). A Shortcoming of Saaty's ...
  • Badri, A., Nadeau, S., and Gbodos sou, A.(20 12). Proposal ...
  • Bowles, J. B., and Pelaez, C. E. (1995). Fuzzy logic ...
  • Braglia, M., Frosolini, M., and Montannari, R. (2003). "Fuzzy Criticality ...
  • Chin, K.S., Chan, A., and Yang, J.B. (2008). Development of ...
  • Dey, P. K. (2002). Quantitative Risk Management Aaids Refinery Construction. ...
  • Dyer, J. S. (1990). Remarks on the analytical hierarchy process. ...
  • nd ed. World Scientific Publishing, Co. Pte. Ltd. Singapore. ...
  • Glenn, K. (2005). Risk Assessment and Decision Making in Business ...
  • Goel A., and Graves, R. J. (2007). Using Failure Mode ...
  • Gilchrist, W. (1993). Modeling Failure Modes and Effects Analysis. International ...
  • Harker, P.T., and Vargas, L.G. (1987). The Theory of Ratio ...
  • Huihui , N., An, C, and Ning, C.(20 10).Extensions on ...
  • Kaplan, S., and Garrick, B. J. (1981).On The Quantitative Definition ...
  • Molenaar, K. R. (2005). Programmatic Cost Risk Analysis for Highway ...
  • Moses, K. D., and Hooker, S. F. (2005). Development of ...
  • Markowski, A. and Mannan, M (2008). Fuzzy Risk Matrix. Journal ...
  • MIL-STD (1980), Military Standard- Procedures for Performing a Failure Mode ...
  • Nasirzadeh, F., Afshar, A., and Khanzadi, M. (2008). Dynamic Risk ...
  • Ossama, Y. A., and Walied , B.(2013). Application of Fuzzy ...
  • Oztas, A, and Okmen, 6. (2005). Judgmental Risk Analysis Process ...
  • PMI, Project Management Institute. (2004). A Guide to the Project ...
  • Perez, J. (1995). Some Comments _ Saaty s AHP. Management ...
  • Puente, J., Pino, R., Priore, P., and Fuente, D. (2002). ...
  • Saaty, T. L. (1982). Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytical ...
  • Sadeghi, N., Fayek, A. R.. and Pedrycz, W. (2010). Fuzzy ...
  • Shaheen, A. A., Fayek, A. R., and AbouRizk, S. M. ...
  • Thompson, P., and Perry, J. (1992). Engineering construction risks: A ...
  • Tang. Xu, Xie.K. L. C and Zhu, M. L. (2002). ...
  • Vendran, V., and Mawdesley, M. J. (2004). Perception of Human ...
  • Wen, F., Wei, F., and Wen, L.(2011). The Application of ...
  • Yager, R.R., and Zadeh, L. A. (1992). An Introduction to ...
  • Zhu, Q., Kuang, X., and Shen, Y.(2003). Risk Matrix Method ...
  • Zeng, J., An, M., and Smith, N. J. (2007). "Application ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع